| CprE 486 HW5 | |||
| CODE | HW5 | HW5 comments | |
| 0000 | 90 | In Supplementary Specification, more features may be proposed. | |
| Microsoft .NET framework is a Free Open Source Component? | |||
| Explain the reason of choosing the specific use case secnario | |||
| 0013 | 92 | The Priority Table seems too simple. | |
| 0083 | 90 | In Supplementary Specification, more features may be proposed. | |
| 0202 | 90 | A higher quality of result is expected for a 5-member group. | |
| 0591 | |||
| 0671 | 90 | For each use case scenario, one SSD is required. | |
| State what scenario(s) you would recommend for implementation in iteration 1 among use case scenarios in your Risk List. | |||
| 0674 | 93 | Please explain the reason of choosing the specific use case secnarios | |
| 1228 | 92 | More features in FURPS analysis are expected. | |
| 1418 | 95 | Please explain the reason of choosing the three specific use case secnarios | |
| 1516 | 92 | More words on explanation on each feature in Supplementary Specification. | |
| 1535 | 93 | Please explain the reason of choosing the specific use case secnarios | |
| 1670 | 90 | A higher quality of result is expected for a 5-member group. | |
| 2155 | 92 | More words on explanation on each feature in Supplementary Specification. | |
| 2381 | 93 | Please explain the reason of choosing the specific use case secnarios | |
| 2668 | 90 | In Supplementary Specification, more features may be proposed. | |
| 2846 | 90 | In Supplementary Specification, more features may be proposed. | |
| Microsoft .NET framework is a Free Open Source Component? | |||
| Explain the reason of choosing the specific use case secnario | |||
| 3661 | 90 | In Supplementary Specification, more features may be proposed. | |
| Microsoft .NET framework is a Free Open Source Component? | |||
| Explain the reason of choosing the specific use case secnario | |||
| 3668 | 90 | For each use case scenario, one SSD is required. | |
| State what scenario(s) you would recommend for implementation in iteration 1 among use case scenarios in your Risk List. | |||
| 3898 | 90 | A higher quality of result is expected for a 5-member group. | |
| 4210 | 85 | Uncomplete work. No SSD and Priority Table | |
| 4314 | 90 | A higher quality of result is expected for a 5-member group. | |
| 4418 | 90 | Please explain the reason of choosing the specific use case secnario | |
| 4490 | 90 | Additional ideas in FUPRS+ are supposed to be proposed instead of explaination of the proposed ideas. | |
| 4873 | 95 | Please explain the reason of choosing the three specific use case secnarios | |
| 5104 | 90 | Please explain the reason of choosing the specific use case secnario | |
| 5222 | 90 | For each use case scenario, one SSD is required. | |
| State what scenario(s) you would recommend for implementation in iteration 1 among use case scenarios in your Risk List. | |||
| 5587 | 91 | More features in FURPS analysis are expected. | |
| 6500 | 90 | For each use case scenario, one SSD is required. | |
| State what scenario(s) you would recommend for implementation in iteration 1 among use case scenarios in your Risk List. | |||
| 6572 | 90 | Please explain the reason of choosing the specific use case secnario | |
| 6735 | 90 | In Supplementary Specification, more features may be proposed. | |
| 6738 | 92 | The Priority Table seems too simple. | |
| 6974 | 90 | In Supplementary Specification, more features may be proposed. | |
| Microsoft .NET framework is a Free Open Source Component? | |||
| Explain the reason of choosing the specific use case secnario | |||
| 7636 | 90 | Additional ideas in FUPRS+ are supposed to be proposed instead of explaination of the proposed ideas. | |
| 7879 | 95 | ||
| 7969 | 92 | More words on explanation on each feature in Supplementary Specification. | |
| 8250 | 95 | Please explain the reason of choosing the three specific use case secnarios | |
| 8473 | 91 | More features in FURPS analysis are expected. | |
| 8598 | 95 | ||
| 9092 | 92 | More words on explanation on each feature in Supplementary Specification. | |
| 9129 | 90 | In Supplementary Specification, more features may be proposed. | |
| 9219 | 90 | Please explain the reason of choosing the specific use case secnario | |
| 9527 | 90 | A higher quality of result is expected for a 5-member group. | |
| 9727 | 95 | ||
| 9933 | 85 | Uncomplete work. No SSD and Priority Table | |
| 91 | More features in FURPS analysis are expected. | ||
| 90 | Additional ideas in FUPRS+ are supposed to be proposed instead of explaination of the proposed ideas. | ||